PHP框架性能測試報(bào)告，php框架性能測試

作為一個(gè)PHP開發(fā)者，而且是初創(chuàng)企業(yè)團(tuán)隊(duì)的技術(shù)開發(fā)者，選擇開發(fā)框架是個(gè)很艱難的事情。

用ThinkPHP的話，招聘一個(gè)剛從培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)出來的開發(fā)者就可以上手了，但是性能和后期代碼解耦是個(gè)讓人頭疼的事情。不過很多第三方功能不需要自己寫，眾多大牛已經(jīng)給鋪好路了。

用Laravel的話，傳說寫起來很爽擴(kuò)展性也夠，但是學(xué)習(xí)成本有點(diǎn)高，總不能給初級開發(fā)者半個(gè)月的時(shí)間去學(xué)習(xí)框架吧。而且據(jù)說江湖人士透漏，Laravel性能不怎么樣，文檔也并不是特別豐富。

用Yii的話，語法有點(diǎn)啰嗦，前后端代碼分離有點(diǎn)小麻煩，不過性能是非常好的，而且已經(jīng)有眾多國內(nèi)大公司在使用了，出現(xiàn)意外可以快速的找到大牛答疑解惑。

不如做個(gè)簡單的性能評測，選個(gè)性能出色的總不會出錯(cuò)

性能測試
測試時(shí)間： 2016年05月06日
測試工具： siege (因?yàn)镸AC系統(tǒng)的ab總是會出現(xiàn) pr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (54) 的錯(cuò)誤，所以選擇了siege)
測試機(jī)器： MacPro Core i5 處理器/8GB內(nèi)存/256GB SSD閃存
測試環(huán)境： Apache PHP5.6
框架版本： ThinkPHP 3.2.3 Laravel 5.2 Yii2.0.5
測試原則： 每次測試循環(huán)5次，取中等數(shù)據(jù)
補(bǔ)充說明：所有項(xiàng)目都是讓在子目錄中

結(jié)果說明

Transactions:        2119 hits 處理請求總數(shù)量
Availability:        96.85 % 可用性
Elapsed time:        9.74 secs 運(yùn)行時(shí)間
Data transferred:      1.31 MB 數(shù)據(jù)傳輸量
Response time:        0.60 secs 響應(yīng)時(shí)間
Transaction rate:     217.56 trans/sec 每秒處理效率
Throughput:        0.13 MB/sec 每秒處理數(shù)據(jù)
Concurrency:       130.28 并發(fā)
Successful transactions:    2162 成功的請求
Failed transactions:       69 失敗的請求
Longest transaction:      2.85 最長的單個(gè)請求
Shortest transaction:      0.01 最短的單個(gè)請求

開始測試

增加一個(gè)控制器，并在控制器中輸入10000次HelloWorld

并發(fā)50循環(huán)10次：

首先向我們走來的是ThinkPHP，看上去還行

Transactions:         500 hits
Availability:       100.00 %
Elapsed time:        2.81 secs
Data transferred:      52.45 MB
Response time:        0.26 secs
Transaction rate:     177.94 trans/sec
Throughput:        18.67 MB/sec
Concurrency:        47.10
Successful transactions:     500
Failed transactions:        0
Longest transaction:      0.48
Shortest transaction:      0.03

然后是Laravle，嗯，略微有些失望

Transactions:         500 hits
Availability:       100.00 %
Elapsed time:        13.33 secs
Data transferred:      52.45 MB
Response time:        1.27 secs
Transaction rate:      37.51 trans/sec
Throughput:        3.93 MB/sec
Concurrency:        47.55
Successful transactions:     500
Failed transactions:        0
Longest transaction:      3.64
Shortest transaction:      0.07

最后賽前比較看好的Yii

Transactions:         500 hits
Availability:       100.00 %
Elapsed time:        4.84 secs
Data transferred:      52.45 MB
Response time:        0.46 secs
Transaction rate:     103.31 trans/sec
Throughput:        10.84 MB/sec
Concurrency:        47.65
Successful transactions:     500
Failed transactions:        0
Longest transaction:      0.88
Shortest transaction:      0.04

并發(fā)200循環(huán)10次：

首先是ThinkPHP

Transactions:        1977 hits
Availability:        98.85 %
Elapsed time:        10.03 secs
Data transferred:     207.40 MB
Response time:        0.95 secs
Transaction rate:     197.11 trans/sec
Throughput:        20.68 MB/sec
Concurrency:       187.68
Successful transactions:    1977
Failed transactions:       23
Longest transaction:      1.22
Shortest transaction:      0.02

然后是Laravel

Transactions:        1890 hits
Availability:        94.50 %
Elapsed time:        51.85 secs
Data transferred:     198.27 MB
Response time:        4.88 secs
Transaction rate:      36.45 trans/sec
Throughput:        3.82 MB/sec
Concurrency:       178.00
Successful transactions:    1890
Failed transactions:       110
Longest transaction:      26.01
Shortest transaction:      0.07

最后是Yii

Transactions:        1996 hits
Availability:        99.80 %
Elapsed time:        18.95 secs
Data transferred:     209.39 MB
Response time:        1.79 secs
Transaction rate:     105.33 trans/sec
Throughput:        11.05 MB/sec
Concurrency:       188.57
Successful transactions:    1996
Failed transactions:        4
Longest transaction:      3.29
Shortest transaction:      0.10

沒想到在沒有優(yōu)化的情況下，ThinkPHP的速度是最快的，Yii略微多一些，Laravel步履蹣跚的跑完了測試。結(jié)果是有些出人意料的，不過上述的測試只代表了開發(fā)環(huán)境，下面會對框架進(jìn)行優(yōu)化，模擬線上環(huán)境。

優(yōu)化框架

ThinkPHP：

APP_DEBUG改為false

Laravel：

APP_DEBUG改為false
php artisan route:cache
php artisan optimize
php artisan config:cache
composer dumpautoload -o

Yii：

YII_DEBUG改為false
composer dumpautoload -o
并發(fā)200循環(huán)10次：

ThinkPHP

Transactions:        1655 hits
Availability:        82.75 %
Elapsed time:        8.21 secs
Data transferred:     173.62 MB
Response time:        0.69 secs
Transaction rate:     201.58 trans/sec
Throughput:        21.15 MB/sec
Concurrency:       139.29
Successful transactions:    1655
Failed transactions:       345
Longest transaction:      7.83
Shortest transaction:      0.00

Laravel:

Transactions:        1520 hits
Availability:        76.00 %
Elapsed time:        34.95 secs
Data transferred:     159.45 MB
Response time:        3.15 secs
Transaction rate:      43.49 trans/sec
Throughput:        4.56 MB/sec
Concurrency:       136.84
Successful transactions:    1520
Failed transactions:       480
Longest transaction:      19.18
Shortest transaction:      0.00

Yii:

Transactions:        1704 hits
Availability:        85.20 %
Elapsed time:        15.16 secs
Data transferred:     178.76 MB
Response time:        1.46 secs
Transaction rate:     112.40 trans/sec
Throughput:        11.79 MB/sec
Concurrency:       164.21
Successful transactions:    1704
Failed transactions:       296
Longest transaction:      9.04
Shortest transaction:      0.00

比較奇怪的一點(diǎn)，當(dāng)框架關(guān)掉調(diào)試模式后都出現(xiàn)了較多失敗的情況。不過明顯的看到，Laravel進(jìn)行簡單的優(yōu)化后，性能大大的提升了，但還是低于其他兩個(gè)框架。

結(jié)論

在測試的過程中，其他我的心情是沮喪的，感覺自己的三觀世界已經(jīng)崩塌了，崩塌至渣。

ThinkPHP的性能比Yii高出一倍，比Laravel高出近四倍
Yii的性能比較中庸，但是在測試中會明顯發(fā)現(xiàn)請求失敗的情況比其他兩個(gè)框架要少
Laravel依舊優(yōu)雅，不過性能堪憂，用網(wǎng)友的話形容比較好 學(xué)之者生用之者死

最后

我的項(xiàng)目最后使用了自建框架進(jìn)行開發(fā)，得益于composer的強(qiáng)大，開發(fā)的過程非常順利，最后附上自有框架在200并發(fā)10次循環(huán)的數(shù)據(jù)，框架開源但是更新比較忙，歡迎在github上搜索PPPHP，和我一起搭建框架。

Transactions:        1672 hits
Availability:        83.60 %
Elapsed time:        6.18 secs
Data transferred:     175.40 MB
Response time:        0.57 secs
Transaction rate:     270.55 trans/sec
Throughput:        28.38 MB/sec
Concurrency:       153.16
Successful transactions:    1672
Failed transactions:       328
Longest transaction:      4.57
Shortest transaction:      0.01