Migrating from Java 8 to Java 17 and Spring 2.3.2 to 3.2.2: Lessons Learned and Key Challenges:
Recently, I worked on a project involving the migration of an application from Java 8 to Java 17 and from Spring 2.3.2 to 3.2.2. This upgrade brought significant improvements in terms of performance, security, and long-term support, but it also came with its fair share of challenges due to API changes and deprecations. In this post, I'll walk through some of the specific issues I encountered and how I resolved them.
Why Migrate to Java 17 and Spring 3.2.2?
Java 17 is a long-term support (LTS) release, offering several new features like sealed classes, records, and improved garbage collection, making it an ideal choice for applications needing longevity and security. Spring 3.2.2 is also updated to support the latest Java versions, bringing enhanced support for reactive programming, security updates, and other optimizations.
However, transitioning to these versions involved adjustments, especially where libraries and frameworks had shifted or deprecated classes.
Key Migration Challenges and Solutions
- HttpStatus to HttpStatusCode In Spring 3.x, HttpStatus has been replaced by HttpStatusCode, which meant updating numerous references in our application.
Issue:
// Old code in Spring 2.x
return new ResponseEntity<>(data, HttpStatus.OK);
Solution: With HttpStatusCode, we can still access the same constants but need to use HttpStatusCode.valueOf() for compatibility:
// Updated code for Spring 3.x
**`**return new ResponseEntity<>(data, HttpStatusCode.valueOf(200));**`**
Alternatively, when possible, I replaced instances with HttpStatusCode.OK for simplicity. This minor change was necessary for
smooth integration with Spring 3.x APIs.
2. Mockito.Matcher to Mockito.ArgumentMatchers
During testing, the migration exposed issues in mocking setups due to changes in the Mockito library. The Matcher class used for defining match conditions in tests has been moved to ArgumentMatchers.
Issue:
// Old code with Mockito.Matcher
**Mockito.when(mockObject.method(Mockito.Matcher.any())).thenReturn(value);**
Solution: The ArgumentMatchers class should now be used instead of Matcher. I updated all instances of Mockito.Matcher to Mockito.ArgumentMatchers, which resolved compatibility issues in tests.
// Updated code with Mockito.ArgumentMatchers
**Mockito.when(mockObject.method(Mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any())).thenReturn(value);**
3. Transition from javax to jakarta
One of the major changes in Spring 3.x was the migration from javax packages to jakarta. This shift affected several dependencies, especially those related to Java EE, such as javax.servlet and javax.persistence.
Issue:
// Old code with javax
return new ResponseEntity<>(data, HttpStatus.OK);
Solution: The Spring 3.x ecosystem now relies on jakarta packages. This required a straightforward but extensive refactoring throughout the codebase, replacing javax imports with their jakarta counterparts.
// Updated code with jakarta
**`**return new ResponseEntity<>(data, HttpStatusCode.valueOf(200));**`**
Updating imports was time-consuming but necessary for the migration. I ensured compatibility with all jakarta imports before proceeding with further tests, as this affected several layers of the application.
Key Takeaways
This migration was challenging, but the benefits of Java 17 and Spring 3.x made it worthwhile. While dealing with issues like HttpStatusCode, ArgumentMatchers, and javax to jakarta transitions required careful planning and code adjustments, the result is a more modern, secure, and maintainable application.
If you’re planning a similar migration, I recommend thoroughly reviewing the release notes of both Java and Spring to anticipate changes. With careful refactoring and extensive testing, you can fully leverage the advantages of these new versions.
The above is the detailed content of Java , Spring Migration. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.
