Blue-green deployment and canary release are two strategies to reduce risk during software updates. Blue-green deployment uses two identical environments, switching traffic from the old (blue) to the new (green) once validated, ensuring zero downtime and easy rollback but requiring more resources. Canary release gradually shifts traffic to the new version, minimizing initial risk exposure and allowing real-user feedback, but needing advanced routing and monitoring. The key differences lie in traffic shift style (instant vs. gradual), risk exposure (all at once vs. controlled rollout), resource usage (double infrastructure vs. incremental), and rollback mechanism (immediate flip vs. progressive shift). Both methods have strengths and can be combined based on system needs.

When people talk about strategies to roll out new software updates with minimal risk, two terms often come up: blue-green deployment and canary release. They both aim to reduce downtime and rollback impact, but they work differently and suit different scenarios.

Blue-Green Deployment: Two Environments, One Switch

In a blue-green deployment, there are always two identical environments running — one live (say, "blue") and one ready to go ("green"). When you deploy a new version, it goes into the idle environment. Once everything checks out, traffic is switched from blue to green in one go.

This method is great when:

• You want zero downtime
• Your system needs high availability
• Rollback is easy — just flip the switch back

The downside? It’s resource-heavy because you’re maintaining two full environments. Also, if there's an issue only after traffic fully shifts, you might have already affected all users.

Canary Release: Slow Rollout, Controlled Risk

Canary release takes a more gradual approach. Instead of switching all traffic at once, you start by sending a small percentage to the new version (the "canary"). If things look good, you slowly increase that percentage until everyone is on the new build.

This works well when:

• You want early feedback from real users without wide exposure
• You're not sure how the new version will behave under load
• You need to catch performance or stability issues before full rollout

It gives you more control and lower risk than blue-green, especially for large user bases. But it does require solid monitoring and routing capabilities to manage traffic effectively.

Key Differences You Should Know

Here’s what really separates the two:

• Traffic Shift Style: Blue-green is all at once; canary is gradual.
• Risk Exposure: Canary limits initial risk, while blue-green exposes everyone at the flip point.
• Resource Usage: Blue-green needs double the infrastructure; canary usually doesn’t.
• Rollback Mechanism: Blue-green rollback is instant; canary may involve shifting traffic back slowly.

Also, canary requires smarter routing (like weighted distribution), while blue-green often relies on simpler load balancer switches.

Both approaches are valuable, and sometimes teams use them together — like doing a canary within a blue-green setup. It’s not always one-or-the-other — depends on your priorities and systems.

The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between blue-green deployment and canary release?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!