


Why Can\'t Default Template Arguments Be Used for Member Function Templates in C ?
Oct 27, 2024 pm 12:38 PMDefault Template Arguments: Why Limited to Class Templates?
In C , default template arguments are only allowed for class templates. This restriction raises the question of why such arguments cannot be defined for member function templates.
Consider the following example:
<code class="cpp">struct my_class { template<class T = int> void mymember(T* vec) { // ... } };</code>
In this example, an attempt is made to define a default type for the template parameter T within a member function template, but this syntax is not permitted by C . Instead, default template arguments are strictly limited to class templates.
Reasoning Behind the Restriction
The prohibition of default template arguments for function templates stems from historical reasons. In early versions of C , freestanding functions were not fully integrated into the language's template system. To encourage the use of member function templates, which were considered more idiomatic, default template arguments were restricted to class templates.
However, this restriction has since been recognized as a limitation, as it unnecessarily differentiates between member function templates and freestanding function templates. As pointed out by Bjarne Stroustrup in a defect report:
"The prohibition of default template arguments for function templates is a misbegotten remnant... [it] seriously cramps programming style by unnecessarily making freestanding functions different from member functions."
C 0x Update
In response to these concerns, C 0x introduced default template arguments for freestanding function templates. This change allows for more flexibility and consistency in template programming.
Example
Consider the following C 0x code:
<code class="cpp">template<typename Iterator, typename Comp = std::less< typename std::iterator_traits<Iterator>::value_type>> void sort(Iterator beg, Iterator end, Comp c = Comp()) { ... }</code>
In this example, a default template argument is specified for the Comp template parameter, allowing the sorting algorithm to use the standard less comparison function by default.
The above is the detailed content of Why Can\'t Default Template Arguments Be Used for Member Function Templates in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Polymorphism in C is implemented through virtual functions and abstract classes, enhancing the reusability and flexibility of the code. 1) Virtual functions allow derived classes to override base class methods, 2) Abstract classes define interfaces, and force derived classes to implement certain methods. This mechanism makes the code more flexible and scalable, but attention should be paid to its possible increase in runtime overhead and code complexity.

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

The destructor in C is used to free the resources occupied by the object. 1) They are automatically called at the end of the object's life cycle, such as leaving scope or using delete. 2) Resource management, exception security and performance optimization should be considered during design. 3) Avoid throwing exceptions in the destructor and use RAII mode to ensure resource release. 4) Define a virtual destructor in the base class to ensure that the derived class objects are properly destroyed. 5) Performance optimization can be achieved through object pools or smart pointers. 6) Keep the destructor thread safe and concise, and focus on resource release.

Implementing polymorphism in C can be achieved through the following steps: 1) use inheritance and virtual functions, 2) define a base class containing virtual functions, 3) rewrite these virtual functions by derived classes, and 4) call these functions using base class pointers or references. Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same basis type, thereby improving code flexibility and maintainability.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.
