Understanding Template Template Parameters
In the realm of C , template template parameters present a challenge for some programmers. Let's dispel a common misconception:
Misconception:
In the code snippet below, what prevents C from considering Z as another templated class rather than a templated parameter?
<code class="cpp">template<class T> class B {}; // Templated class template<template<class X> class Z = B> // Line in question class BB{};</code>
Explanation:
Template template parameters behave similarly to normal template type parameters. However, they do not accept concrete types; instead, they accept templates themselves. Here's a simplified understanding:
- Template Type Parameters: Match concrete types (e.g., int, double, Foo, etc.)
- Template Template Parameters: Match templates (i.e., classes or structs with template parameters)
In the example, the syntax template class Z = B> defines a templated type parameter Z that expects a template class with one template parameter X.
Template Template Template Parameters (Not Possible)
It's important to note that template template template parameters are not possible in C . This is a design decision made by the standardization committee to simplify compiler implementation.
Analogy: Functions and Function Pointers
For a better understanding, draw parallels with functions and function pointers:
- Functions: Accept values as arguments
- Function Pointers: Accept functions (arguments) that accept values
Similarly, template template parameters accept templates (arguments) that accept arguments.
Example and Use Case
Although template template template parameters are not possible, let's imagine a situation where they might be useful:
Suppose we want to create a generic graph searching library with algorithms that operate on different types of stacks or queues, which in turn can be implemented with different container types. A template template template parameter could enable us to specify all these aspects in a single function call. However, since template template template parameters are not available, this use case remains a hypothetical example.
The above is the detailed content of Why Can\'t C Handle Template Template Template Parameters?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Polymorphism in C is implemented through virtual functions and abstract classes, enhancing the reusability and flexibility of the code. 1) Virtual functions allow derived classes to override base class methods, 2) Abstract classes define interfaces, and force derived classes to implement certain methods. This mechanism makes the code more flexible and scalable, but attention should be paid to its possible increase in runtime overhead and code complexity.

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

The destructor in C is used to free the resources occupied by the object. 1) They are automatically called at the end of the object's life cycle, such as leaving scope or using delete. 2) Resource management, exception security and performance optimization should be considered during design. 3) Avoid throwing exceptions in the destructor and use RAII mode to ensure resource release. 4) Define a virtual destructor in the base class to ensure that the derived class objects are properly destroyed. 5) Performance optimization can be achieved through object pools or smart pointers. 6) Keep the destructor thread safe and concise, and focus on resource release.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Implementing polymorphism in C can be achieved through the following steps: 1) use inheritance and virtual functions, 2) define a base class containing virtual functions, 3) rewrite these virtual functions by derived classes, and 4) call these functions using base class pointers or references. Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same basis type, thereby improving code flexibility and maintainability.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.
