


**How Does GetSystemTimeAdjustment Misrepresent System Time Increments?**
Nov 02, 2024 pm 08:59 PMHow GetSystemTimeAdjustment Misleads on System Time Increments
While the GetSystemTimeAdjustment function provides insights into system time adjustments, it doesn't accurately reflect the actual interval and increment used to update the system clock, as evidenced by empirical observations.
Assumption Validity
Your assumption that timestamps returned by GetSystemTimeAsFileTime should exhibit no change or multiples of the increment retrieved by GetSystemTimeAdjustment is correct, provided the system time is being synchronized periodically.
Reason for Discrepancy
The discrepancy stems from the fact that GetSystemTimeAsFileTime's 10 ns resolution far exceeds the actual update period of the system clock. On modern systems, the clock is typically incremented in increments of 0.0025 seconds, not the 0.0156 seconds reported by GetSystemTimeAdjustment.
This mismatch arises because GetSystemTimeAsFileTime records the changes in the system time at its higher resolution than the actual clock update. As a result, the observed changes do not align with the reported increment.
Implications and Alternative
Rather than relying on GetSystemTimeAdjustment, use NtQueryTimerResolution to determine the actual update period of the system time in 100 ns units. Note that the value returned by NtQueryTimerResolution can be set using NtSetTimerResolution or the multimedia timer interface. However, this setting may impact the observed values, especially when multimedia applications are active.
To accurately capture system time transitions, monitor the FILETIME values returned by GetSystemTimeAsFileTime. By looking at the difference between consecutive calls, you can measure the actual time increment.
The above is the detailed content of **How Does GetSystemTimeAdjustment Misrepresent System Time Increments?**. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
