SFINAE Fails for Class Template Member Functions
The Substitute Failure, Is Not An Error (SFINAE) mechanism, commonly used in template metaprogramming, appears to exhibit peculiar behavior when applied to class template member functions.
The Problem
Consider the following code snippet:
<code class="cpp">#include <type_traits> struct A{}; struct B{}; template <typename T> struct Foo { // Conditional enable bar() for T == A typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, A>::value>::type bar() {} // Conditional enable bar() for T == B typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, B>::value>::type bar() {} };</code>
This code attempts to define two overloads of bar() in the Foo class template, with SFINAE used to conditionally enable each overload based on the value of T. However, the code fails to compile with the following error:
<code class="cpp">error: 'typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<T, B>::value>::type Foo<T>::bar()' cannot be overloaded</code>
The Explanation
SFINAE is typically used to enable or disable template specializations based on template arguments. However, SFINAE only applies to deduced template arguments, meaning arguments that are automatically deduced during overload resolution. In the case of member functions, template arguments are not deduced but rather explicitly specified when instantiating the class. Therefore, SFINAE is not applicable to member functions.
The Solution
There are two main ways to address this issue:
- Use function templates: Define separate function templates for each overload, as shown below:
<code class="cpp">template <typename T> void bar(Foo<T><- A) {} template <typename T> void bar(Foo<T><- B) {}
- Use explicit class template specialization: Define separate class templates for each overload, as shown below:
<code class="cpp">template <typename> struct Foo; template <> struct Foo<A> { void bar() {} }; template <> struct Foo<B> { void bar() {} };</code>
The above is the detailed content of Why Does SFINAE Fail for Class Template Member Functions?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Implementing polymorphism in C can be achieved through the following steps: 1) use inheritance and virtual functions, 2) define a base class containing virtual functions, 3) rewrite these virtual functions by derived classes, and 4) call these functions using base class pointers or references. Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same basis type, thereby improving code flexibility and maintainability.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5
