


How to Efficiently Implement a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using Only 32-Bit Atomics?
Dec 17, 2024 am 08:38 AMImplementing a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using 32-Bit Atomics
In embedded systems, creating a 64-bit atomic counter using only 32-bit atomics is often necessary. A common approach is to leverage a generation count with the least significant bit serving as a read lock. However, the question arises whether there are other potential methods and whether the suggested implementation is optimal.
Alternative Approaches
The recommended implementation is a viable approach, but there are alternative methods to consider:
- SeqLock Pattern: This technique utilizes a monotonically increasing generation count with alternating odd and even values. Readers spin until the generation count is stable and the read lock bit (least significant bit) is unset. This method offers improved performance in scenarios with multiple readers but only a single writer.
- Direct 64-Bit Atomic Operations: While less common, some systems may support 64-bit atomic operations natively. In such cases, using atomic operations directly for both halves of the 64-bit counter can eliminate the need for locks or sequence counters.
Design Considerations
Regarding the provided implementation, there are a few areas that can be optimized:
- Atomic Read-Modify-Write (RMW) for Generation Count: Instead of using atomic RMW operations for the generation count, it's possible to employ pure loads and stores with release ordering. This change reduces the overhead associated with RMW operations.
- Atomic Increment for Payload: It's unnecessary to utilize atomic RMW for incrementing the payload; pure loads, increments, and stores suffice. This modification further reduces the overhead of maintaining the counter.
Additional Considerations
- ARM Load-Pair Instructions: Some ARM architectures support efficient load-pair instructions (e.g., ldrd or ldp) that can simultaneously load both 32-bit halves of a 64-bit value. Taking advantage of these instructions can enhance performance.
- Compiler Optimizations: Compilers may not always generate optimal code for atomic operations on large structures like uint64_t. Avoiding atomic access to such structures and instead using volatile keyword and memory barriers can result in more efficient code.
Conclusion
The suggested technique for constructing a 64-bit atomic counter using 32-bit atomics is appropriate, especially in scenarios with a single writer and multiple readers. However, other options like the SeqLock pattern or direct 64-bit atomic operations may be more suitable in specific situations. By addressing the outlined design considerations and exploring additional optimizations, programmers can further improve the efficiency of their implementations.
The above is the detailed content of How to Efficiently Implement a 64-Bit Atomic Counter Using Only 32-Bit Atomics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Polymorphism in C is implemented through virtual functions and abstract classes, enhancing the reusability and flexibility of the code. 1) Virtual functions allow derived classes to override base class methods, 2) Abstract classes define interfaces, and force derived classes to implement certain methods. This mechanism makes the code more flexible and scalable, but attention should be paid to its possible increase in runtime overhead and code complexity.

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

The destructor in C is used to free the resources occupied by the object. 1) They are automatically called at the end of the object's life cycle, such as leaving scope or using delete. 2) Resource management, exception security and performance optimization should be considered during design. 3) Avoid throwing exceptions in the destructor and use RAII mode to ensure resource release. 4) Define a virtual destructor in the base class to ensure that the derived class objects are properly destroyed. 5) Performance optimization can be achieved through object pools or smart pointers. 6) Keep the destructor thread safe and concise, and focus on resource release.

Implementing polymorphism in C can be achieved through the following steps: 1) use inheritance and virtual functions, 2) define a base class containing virtual functions, 3) rewrite these virtual functions by derived classes, and 4) call these functions using base class pointers or references. Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same basis type, thereby improving code flexibility and maintainability.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.
