


Why Does Replacing 0.1f with 0 Result in a 10x Performance Increase in My Code?
Dec 19, 2024 pm 06:13 PMInfluence of Subnormal Floating-Point Numerals on Performance
In the provided code snippet, a minor alteration that seemed insignificant significantly impacted performance: changing 0.1f to 0 resulted in a 10x slowdown. This performance difference arises from the handling of subnormal (denormalized) floating-point numbers.
Subnormal numbers are an approximation of zero, being smaller than the smallest normal floating-point number that can be represented. They often result from operations that produce very small values. Operations on subnormal numbers are notoriously slow compared to operations on normalized floating-point numbers. This is because many processors lack the ability to handle subnormal numbers directly and instead must resort to slower microcode routines.
Numerical Examination
The two code snippets, one using 0.1f and the other using 0, produce different outputs after repeated iterations. When using 0.1f, the values converge to non-zero values close to zero. However, when using 0, the values converge to zero itself. This difference in numerical behavior explains the performance gap.
Denormal Flushing
To verify that subnormal numbers are responsible for the performance disparity, we can flush them to zero by adding the following line to the beginning of the code:
_MM_SET_FLUSH_ZERO_MODE(_MM_FLUSH_ZERO_ON);
This instructs the processor to treat all subnormal numbers as zero. With this modification, the performance difference between using 0.1f and 0 becomes negligible. This confirms that subnormal numbers are indeed the source of the slowdown.
Conclusion
In this scenario, avoiding the creation of subnormal numbers by replacing 0.1f with 0 dramatically improves performance by preventing the processor from engaging in slow subnormal number handling routines. This optimization serves as a reminder of the sometimes detrimental impact of denormalized floating-point numbers on performance and the importance of considering their potential presence in numerical computations.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Replacing 0.1f with 0 Result in a 10x Performance Increase in My Code?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
