


std::vector::reserve() vs. std::vector::resize(): When Should I Use Which?
Dec 29, 2024 pm 01:04 PMUnderstanding the Difference: std::vector::resize() vs. std::vector::reserve()
The topic of std::vector::reserve() vs. std::vector::resize() has sparked discussion within the programming community. This article aims to clarify their distinct roles in vector manipulation.
std::vector::reserve()
std::vector::reserve() allocates memory for the specified number of elements but does not resize the vector itself. The vector maintains its original logical size. This method is beneficial when you anticipate adding elements to the vector and want to optimize performance by preallocating memory.
std::vector::resize()
std::vector::resize() modifies the vector's size to the specified number of elements. If the vector needs to be expanded, it will allocate additional memory. Unlike reserve(), resize() initializes any new elements to their default values.
Example Usage
Consider the code provided in the question:
void MyClass::my_method() { my_member.reserve(n_dim); for (int k = 0; k < n_dim; k++) my_member[k] = k; }
According to the response, using reserve() here is incorrect. To correctly write elements to the vector, one should use resize():
void MyClass::my_method() { my_member.resize(n_dim); for (int k = 0; k < n_dim; k++) my_member[k] = k; }
Visual Studio 2010 SP1 Behavior
The mentioned "crashing" behavior of the code in Visual Studio 2010 SP1 is consistent with the correct behavior described in the response. Attempting to access an element beyond the vector's logical size (in this case, my_member[5]) before resizing the vector results in undefined behavior.
Reserve and Invalidation
It's important to note that using reserve() and then adding elements through push_back() may invalidate references, iterators, or pointers to data in the vector. This is because reserve() allocates memory without resizing, and when new elements are added, they may be placed in a different location.
In conclusion, std::vector::reserve() and std::vector::resize() have distinct purposes. Reserve() preallocates memory, while resize() modifies the vector's size and initializes new elements. Understanding their differences is essential for efficient vector manipulation.
The above is the detailed content of std::vector::reserve() vs. std::vector::resize(): When Should I Use Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Polymorphism in C is implemented through virtual functions and abstract classes, enhancing the reusability and flexibility of the code. 1) Virtual functions allow derived classes to override base class methods, 2) Abstract classes define interfaces, and force derived classes to implement certain methods. This mechanism makes the code more flexible and scalable, but attention should be paid to its possible increase in runtime overhead and code complexity.

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

The destructor in C is used to free the resources occupied by the object. 1) They are automatically called at the end of the object's life cycle, such as leaving scope or using delete. 2) Resource management, exception security and performance optimization should be considered during design. 3) Avoid throwing exceptions in the destructor and use RAII mode to ensure resource release. 4) Define a virtual destructor in the base class to ensure that the derived class objects are properly destroyed. 5) Performance optimization can be achieved through object pools or smart pointers. 6) Keep the destructor thread safe and concise, and focus on resource release.

Implementing polymorphism in C can be achieved through the following steps: 1) use inheritance and virtual functions, 2) define a base class containing virtual functions, 3) rewrite these virtual functions by derived classes, and 4) call these functions using base class pointers or references. Polymorphism allows different types of objects to be treated as objects of the same basis type, thereby improving code flexibility and maintainability.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.
