ViewModel or Model: Where Should INotifyPropertyChanged Live in MVVM?
Jan 02, 2025 pm 01:00 PMWhere Should INotifyPropertyChanged Be Implemented in MVVM: ViewModel or Model?
When developing MVVM applications, the question arises whether the ViewModel or the Model should implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface. While many examples show the Model implementing this interface, Josh Smith's CommandSink example takes a different approach by having the ViewModel implement it.
Rationale for Model INotifyPropertyChanged Implementation
Some argue that the Model should not implement INotifyPropertyChanged, as it is not UI-specific. However, this argument overlooks the fact that this interface merely notifies of changes, regardless of UI involvement. Therefore, it is suitable for other use cases, such as triggering non-UI logic.
Rationale for ViewModel INotifyPropertyChanged Implementation
Others support the ViewModel implementing INotifyPropertyChanged, as it simplifies data binding. It eliminates the need for intricate event handlers on the Model or propagating property changes from the ViewModel to the Model.
Is There a Standard Approach?
Despite these arguments, there is no definitive answer to this question. MVVM allows for flexibility in implementation. Consider the following factors when making your decision:
- Performance: In most cases where the Model is not receiving external updates, implementing INotifyPropertyChanged in the Model can create unnecessary performance overhead.
- Ease of Development: Implementing INotifyPropertyChanged in the ViewModel simplifies binding, especially when working with potentially stale data.
- Testability: Mocking the Model becomes easier when it does not implement INotifyPropertyChanged.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision depends on the specific requirements of your project. Weigh the pros and cons of each approach to determine the most appropriate solution. Avoid dogma and explore different implementations to find what works best for your application.
The above is the detailed content of ViewModel or Model: Where Should INotifyPropertyChanged Live in MVVM?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Yes, function overloading is a polymorphic form in C, specifically compile-time polymorphism. 1. Function overload allows multiple functions with the same name but different parameter lists. 2. The compiler decides which function to call at compile time based on the provided parameters. 3. Unlike runtime polymorphism, function overloading has no extra overhead at runtime, and is simple to implement but less flexible.

C has two main polymorphic types: compile-time polymorphism and run-time polymorphism. 1. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing high efficiency but may lead to code bloating. 2. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions and inheritance, providing flexibility but performance overhead.

Yes, polymorphisms in C are very useful. 1) It provides flexibility to allow easy addition of new types; 2) promotes code reuse and reduces duplication; 3) simplifies maintenance, making the code easier to expand and adapt to changes. Despite performance and memory management challenges, its advantages are particularly significant in complex systems.

C destructorscanleadtoseveralcommonerrors.Toavoidthem:1)Preventdoubledeletionbysettingpointerstonullptrorusingsmartpointers.2)Handleexceptionsindestructorsbycatchingandloggingthem.3)Usevirtualdestructorsinbaseclassesforproperpolymorphicdestruction.4

People who study Python transfer to C The most direct confusion is: Why can't you write like Python? Because C, although the syntax is more complex, provides underlying control capabilities and performance advantages. 1. In terms of syntax structure, C uses curly braces {} instead of indentation to organize code blocks, and variable types must be explicitly declared; 2. In terms of type system and memory management, C does not have an automatic garbage collection mechanism, and needs to manually manage memory and pay attention to releasing resources. RAII technology can assist resource management; 3. In functions and class definitions, C needs to explicitly access modifiers, constructors and destructors, and supports advanced functions such as operator overloading; 4. In terms of standard libraries, STL provides powerful containers and algorithms, but needs to adapt to generic programming ideas; 5

Polymorphisms in C are divided into runtime polymorphisms and compile-time polymorphisms. 1. Runtime polymorphism is implemented through virtual functions, allowing the correct method to be called dynamically at runtime. 2. Compilation-time polymorphism is implemented through function overloading and templates, providing higher performance and flexibility.

C polymorphismincludescompile-time,runtime,andtemplatepolymorphism.1)Compile-timepolymorphismusesfunctionandoperatoroverloadingforefficiency.2)Runtimepolymorphismemploysvirtualfunctionsforflexibility.3)Templatepolymorphismenablesgenericprogrammingfo

C polymorphismisuniqueduetoitscombinationofcompile-timeandruntimepolymorphism,allowingforbothefficiencyandflexibility.Toharnessitspowerstylishly:1)Usesmartpointerslikestd::unique_ptrformemorymanagement,2)Ensurebaseclasseshavevirtualdestructors,3)Emp
