Spring's dependency injection mechanism is mainly
based on type , not names. When encountering multiple types of the same type (such as TenantDataSource), it will not automatically return to match according to the parameter name. This is because Spring cannot always guarantee the parameter name in the method to match the Bean name.
Java By default,will not retain the parameter name in the compiled bytecode. If there is no special configuration, the parameter names (for example, TenantadataSource and TenantbDataSource) will be cleared during the compilation and replaced them with universal names, such as ARG0 and ARG1. Therefore, Spring cannot know that TenanTadataSource refers to the bean called "Tenanta-Datasource".
Solve the parameter name retention problemYou can use the Compiler logo to retain the parameter name in the byte code:
-parameters
<code>javac -parameters MyClass.java</code>
Spring avoids assumptions to prevent accidents. For example, if the parameter name is accidentally exchanged or named, or the developers expect different mappings, what will happen? If there is no clear guidance (such as
), Spring cannot determine the intention of the developer, and choose to throw an error instead of injecting the wrong bean.
@Qualifier
Spring follows the principle of "explicitly better than hidden". Dependent injection should be predictable, and does not depend on the assumptions of parameter names to the matching of Bean name matching. Spring is consistent in different environments and frameworks. Some languages ??or frameworks (such as KOTLIN) retain the parameter name by default, while other languages ??are not retained. Therefore, Spring avoids dependent parameter names to achieve key functions.
When can the name match can work automatically?
Although Spring does not match the parameter name by default, it can be matched according to the parameter name in some cases, but it depends on your settings:
Spring 4.3 Parameter name Discover
If the logo compile code, when there is ambiguity, Spring can infer the name of the Bean from the parameter name.
Example:
-parameters
).
<code>@Autowired public TenantService(TenantDataSource tenantADataSource, TenantDataSource tenantBDataSource) { this.tenantADataSource = tenantADataSource; this.tenantBDataSource = tenantBDataSource; }</code>Why is Spring more inclined to use @qualifier?
-parameters
Use to ensure definition and eliminate ambiguity, so that both developers and frameworks can clearly intention. @Qualifier
In this way, Spring can accurately know which bean to inject, regardless of parameter name or other factors.
Spring should be smarter?
Some people may think that a framework like Spring should be more intelligent, and the Bean name is automatically matched with the parameter name when there is ambiguity. But:
- Back compatibility : Automatically changing this behavior may destroy the existing applications that do not match the Bean name and parameter name. predictability
- : explicitly solve the ambiguity (for example, through ) to ensure that developers always know which bean is being injected. Reacable assumptions may cause difficulty in debugging, especially in large complex applications.
@Qualifier
The situation in the real scene
In most actual applications:
Developers use meaningful bean names and parameter names, but they also prefer to prefer
- to ensure their clarity.
-
@Qualifier
For multi -example scenes, dynamically configure - or factory -based methods (eg ABSTRACTROUTINGATASORCE), instead of manually connecting each bean. Key points
Spring first injects by type
- : If there is only one type of Bean, Spring will inject it without any problems. If there are multiple beans of the same type, Spring requires additional prompts (such as
- ) to solve ambiguity.
The parameter name is not reliable.
@Qualifier
: By default, the parameter name will not be kept in the Java bytecode, so Spring cannot use them to match the parameter with the parameters. Even if the parameter name ( ) is retained, Spring will avoid the well -known matching matching, unless the configuration is clear. -
Explicit is better than hidden : Spring priority consideration can be predictable, and encourages developers to use explicit configuration (such as
-parameters
or ) instead of relying on hidden matching. -
Spring's design concept
: Misty errors can prevent accidents and ensure that developers fully control the dependence injection.@Qualifier
@Primary
The above is the detailed content of spring-: why-spring-cannot-match-by-name-for-injection. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

The difference between HashMap and Hashtable is mainly reflected in thread safety, null value support and performance. 1. In terms of thread safety, Hashtable is thread-safe, and its methods are mostly synchronous methods, while HashMap does not perform synchronization processing, which is not thread-safe; 2. In terms of null value support, HashMap allows one null key and multiple null values, while Hashtable does not allow null keys or values, otherwise a NullPointerException will be thrown; 3. In terms of performance, HashMap is more efficient because there is no synchronization mechanism, and Hashtable has a low locking performance for each operation. It is recommended to use ConcurrentHashMap instead.

Java uses wrapper classes because basic data types cannot directly participate in object-oriented operations, and object forms are often required in actual needs; 1. Collection classes can only store objects, such as Lists use automatic boxing to store numerical values; 2. Generics do not support basic types, and packaging classes must be used as type parameters; 3. Packaging classes can represent null values ??to distinguish unset or missing data; 4. Packaging classes provide practical methods such as string conversion to facilitate data parsing and processing, so in scenarios where these characteristics are needed, packaging classes are indispensable.

StaticmethodsininterfaceswereintroducedinJava8toallowutilityfunctionswithintheinterfaceitself.BeforeJava8,suchfunctionsrequiredseparatehelperclasses,leadingtodisorganizedcode.Now,staticmethodsprovidethreekeybenefits:1)theyenableutilitymethodsdirectly

The JIT compiler optimizes code through four methods: method inline, hot spot detection and compilation, type speculation and devirtualization, and redundant operation elimination. 1. Method inline reduces call overhead and inserts frequently called small methods directly into the call; 2. Hot spot detection and high-frequency code execution and centrally optimize it to save resources; 3. Type speculation collects runtime type information to achieve devirtualization calls, improving efficiency; 4. Redundant operations eliminate useless calculations and inspections based on operational data deletion, enhancing performance.

Instance initialization blocks are used in Java to run initialization logic when creating objects, which are executed before the constructor. It is suitable for scenarios where multiple constructors share initialization code, complex field initialization, or anonymous class initialization scenarios. Unlike static initialization blocks, it is executed every time it is instantiated, while static initialization blocks only run once when the class is loaded.

Factory mode is used to encapsulate object creation logic, making the code more flexible, easy to maintain, and loosely coupled. The core answer is: by centrally managing object creation logic, hiding implementation details, and supporting the creation of multiple related objects. The specific description is as follows: the factory mode handes object creation to a special factory class or method for processing, avoiding the use of newClass() directly; it is suitable for scenarios where multiple types of related objects are created, creation logic may change, and implementation details need to be hidden; for example, in the payment processor, Stripe, PayPal and other instances are created through factories; its implementation includes the object returned by the factory class based on input parameters, and all objects realize a common interface; common variants include simple factories, factory methods and abstract factories, which are suitable for different complexities.

InJava,thefinalkeywordpreventsavariable’svaluefrombeingchangedafterassignment,butitsbehaviordiffersforprimitivesandobjectreferences.Forprimitivevariables,finalmakesthevalueconstant,asinfinalintMAX_SPEED=100;wherereassignmentcausesanerror.Forobjectref

There are two types of conversion: implicit and explicit. 1. Implicit conversion occurs automatically, such as converting int to double; 2. Explicit conversion requires manual operation, such as using (int)myDouble. A case where type conversion is required includes processing user input, mathematical operations, or passing different types of values ??between functions. Issues that need to be noted are: turning floating-point numbers into integers will truncate the fractional part, turning large types into small types may lead to data loss, and some languages ??do not allow direct conversion of specific types. A proper understanding of language conversion rules helps avoid errors.
