The New EdTech Reality

StudyFetch's expansion reflects a growing trend. Introduced in September 2023, this AI-powered platform reached 1 million users within seven months and now collaborates with Canvas, D2L, and Blackboard for seamless integration. “Course material is crucial,” says CEO Esan Durani. “Each AI-generated response is based on the instructor’s own content, significantly reducing the risk of hallucinations.”

Students typically spend 20 minutes per tutoring session, and instructors receive heat-maps that show which subtopics caused confusion before the next class. Tools such as Kira Learning and Century Tech offer similar real-time insights, while CoSN’s most recent survey shows that 72% of U.S. school districts continue to provide 1-to-1 device access even after pandemic-related funding ended.

There has been progress — but preparedness remains inconsistent.

The Equity Alarm

“Access to devices, internet connectivity, and child safety protections remain inconsistent — particularly in rural and underserved communities,” explains Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. She highlights newer policy changes that permit remote learning days instead of snow days and advocates for districts to require at least six to nine hours of AI literacy training for teachers before implementing digital tools.
She also emphasizes that students — not only educators — need focused assistance in mastering these tools.

"Teachers are essential," she insists. "Only use algorithms if they free up more time for teacher-student interaction." Just as importantly, she adds, there must be safeguards against screen fatigue, unapproved edtech platforms, and technologies that widen the digital gap rather than narrow it.

Global Voices on Readiness

Andreas Schleicher, director for education and skills at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, sees promising signs in global LMS adoption — yet warns of an underlying challenge.

“AI simply amplifies ideas — both good and bad,” Schleicher states. “We’re not seeing real improvement in students’ ability to deal with ambiguity and complexity.”

According to Schleicher, true readiness means students become independent, analytical thinkers — not passive recipients of information. He believes the most impactful policy since 2020 has been involving teachers as co-developers, rather than just end-users, of digital resources.

“Involving educators directly in the creation of digital learning tools has worked far better than top-down directives,” Schleicher observes.

Regarding AI’s role in classrooms, he issues a firm warning: “The real danger isn’t AI itself, but how it's applied. When a student is identified by an algorithm, it still needs a human to decide what happens next.”

Chris Dede, senior research fellow at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, argues that the core issue is not technical — it’s philosophical: “Our world is now permanently hybrid. Schools, districts, and nations that insist on face-to-face-only instruction are limiting their graduates' effectiveness in other areas of life.”

Dede contends that education must align with broader societal transformations: “Hybrid learning isn't exclusive to schools. Businesses, families, and institutions worldwide now function across distances. Education must keep pace.”

His research indicates that schools already familiar with technology adapted quickly when the pandemic hit. However, those without strong digital foundations struggled.

“It wasn’t just about having the right tools,” he explains. “It was about how fast teachers could learn to use them effectively.”

Pasi Sahlberg, Finnish educator, author, and professor at the University of Melbourne, supports the need for a mindset shift.

“A key takeaway from the pandemic is that learning doesn’t stop when kids can’t attend school — it merely takes a different form,” he notes. “Many students developed their own learning systems, often using digital tools and global peer connections.”

Sahlberg views this as evidence of a widespread misconception among many education systems — that students only learn what adults explicitly teach them.
However, he quickly points out that digital learning has its limitations as much as its benefits.

“While a lot can be learned digitally, many things cannot,” he says. “One of those things is the strength of personal relationships, face-to-face interactions.”

He cautions that systems centered solely on delivering content miss the essence of education: “Creating well-rounded individuals requires a deeper appreciation of what interpersonal engagement can achieve.”

From AI TAs to Instant Pivots

Platforms like StudyFetch now enable professors to create AI teaching assistants — such as “Sparky” — that reflect their tone, expectations, and course materials. Students can engage in auto-generated learning games, ask follow-up questions, and highlight confusing topics instantly. Educators then get anonymized feedback dashboards that guide instruction the following day.

Durani notes that thousands of these learning games were created “within days” of launch. “We began by focusing on student development,” he says. “Now we're designing for both educators and learners together, in one continuous loop.”

The 48-Hour Pivot Checklist

If another emergency forces schools online tomorrow, here’s what education systems need ready today:

• Devices and Connectivity: Keep a 1-to-1 device ratio and identify community Wi-Fi gaps.
• Teacher AI Literacy: At least six to nine hours of professional development on ethical and effective AI use.
• Opt-In AI Grading: Ensure teacher autonomy; no tool should replace human judgment.
• Equity Guardrails: Screen-time limits, accessibility features,\ and secure platform design.
• Student Agency Metrics: Track self-directed learning, not just login frequency.
• Pre-Approved Response Plan: Clear guidelines for shifting rapidly to hybrid or fully remote models.

Reimagining Readiness — This Time for Every Child

Since 2020, we’ve gained valuable insights: easy access matters, data transparency strengthens teachers, and learning doesn’t have to halt when buildings close. Yet the biggest test lies ahead.

As Schleicher reminds us, “AI will amplify whatever we feed into it.” If we input inequality and low standards, we will only worsen the problems we aimed to fix. But if we input teacher-driven design, student independence, and timely support, we may finally deliver what repeated crises have demanded: resilience without setbacks.

Because when the next bell doesn’t ring, readiness won’t be measured by who logged in fastest — it will be measured by who kept learning.

The above is the detailed content of Are Schools Ready For The Next Shutdown?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!