CSS preprocessors such as Sass and Less make CSS easier to maintain by introducing variables, nesting, and mixing features. 1. Variables can store colors, font sizes and reuse; 2. Mix them in CSS code blocks that allow the definition of reusable; 3. Nesting and improving HTML structure visualization, suitable for multi-file complex projects. Both need to be compiled into standard CSS, Sass supports .scss and .sass, and Less uses .less. Sass syntax is more flexible, and Less relies on JavaScript to process. Despite the rise of modern CSS and CSS-in-JS, preprocessors can reduce duplicate code and remain modular in medium and large projects, especially for teams without complex build systems or custom framework themes.

CSS preprocessors like Sass and Less are tools that extend the functionality of regular CSS, making it easier to manage and maintain large stylesheets. They introduce features such as variables, nesting, mixins, and functions — things that aren't available in plain CSS.

Why Use a Preprocessor?

The main reason people use preprocessors is to write cleaner, more organized, and reusable code. For example:

• Variables let you store values ??like colors or font sizes and reuse them throughout your stylesheet.
• Mixins allows you to define chunks of CSS that can be reused in different places.
• Nesting makes it easier to visualize the structure of your HTML by keeping related styles grouped together.

This helps especially when working on big projects with multiple CSS files and complex layouts.

How Do Sass and Less Work?

Both Sass and Less need to be compiled into regular CSS before browsers can understand them. This compilation usually happens during development using build tools like Gulp, Webpack, or even command-line tools.

Sass uses .scss or .sass file extensions, while Less uses .less . Once processed, they output standard .css files.

Some key differences:

• Sass has two syntaxes: SCSS (which looks like normal CSS) and the older indented syntax.
• Less uses a simpler syntax and relies more on JavaScript for processing.

Most modern workflows support either one, so choosing between them often comes down to personal preference or team familiarity.

Are They Still Worth Using?

With the rise of CSS-in-JS libraries and newer CSS features like native variables and @layer , some developers question whether preprocessors are still needed.

But if you're working on a medium-to-large project without a complex build system, preprocessors still offer real benefits. They help keep your styles modular and reduce repetition without requiring a full framework.

Also, many popular front-end frameworks (like Bootstrap) have used Sass historically, so knowing how to work with it can help when customizing themes or components.

In short, Sass and Less are not magic tools, but they make writing and organizing CSS much smoother. If your project grows beyond a few CSS files, giving one a try might save you time in the long run.

Basically that's it.

The above is the detailed content of What are CSS preprocessors like Sass or Less?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!