The main difference between Sass and SCSS is the syntax. SCSS uses curly braces {} and semicolon similar to standard CSS; to facilitate the transition from CSS, and supports direct copying of CSS code and adding variables, mixing and other functions; while Sass adopts indented syntax, no curly braces and semicolons are required, and relies on line breaks and spaces to define code blocks. It has a simpler style but is also easy to cause problems due to format errors. The two can be converted to each other through tools. Modern frameworks mostly use SCSS by default because they are easier to learn and have rich resources; file extensions are .sass and .scss respectively, and the choice should be based on personal or team preferences.
Sass and SCSS are both CSS preprocessors, but they different mainly in syntax. Sass was the original syntax, while SCSS (Sassy CSS) is a newer format that's more similar to standard CSS.
SCSS Looks Like Regular CSS
SCSS syntax uses the same block formatting as regular CSS — curly braces {}
to wrap selectors and semicolons ;
to end lines. This makes it very easy to transition from plain CSS to SCSS because you can literally copy your CSS into an SCSS file and start adding features like variables and mixins right away.
For example:
.container { width: 100%; background-color: #f0f0f0; }
This familiarity helps developers who are new to preprocessors feel more comfortable using SCSS without learning a completely new way of writing styles.
Sass Uses Indentation Instead of Braces
The original Sass syntax relies on indentation to define blocks, much like Python or YAML. It doesn't require curly braces or semicolons — instead, line breaks and spacing do the job.
Here's the same code written in Sass:
.container width: 100% background-color: #f0f0f0
This can make your code look cleaner and more minimal, but also means that formatting mistakes — like mixing spaces and tabs — can cause errors.
Some people prefer this style for its simplicity and readability, especially when working with deep nested rules.
You Can Convert Between Sass and SCSS
It's possible to convert files from one syntax to the other using tools like the Sass converter in Dart Sass. This allows teams to choose their preferred syntax or migrate legacy codebases easily.
If you're starting a new project, most modern frameworks and build tools default to SCSS because of its wider adoption and easier learning curve.
Also, keep in mind:
- File extensions matter:
.sass
for the indented syntax,.scss
for SCSS. - Most online examples and tutorials use SCSS these days, so finding resources for the original Sass syntax might be harder.
Final Thought
Which one you use really comes down to personal preference or team standards. If you like clean, minimal formatting and don't mind strict indentation rules, go with Sass. But if you want something that feels just like CSS with extra power under the hood, SCSS is probably the better fit.
Either way, both give you the same features — variables, nesting, mixins, imports, and more. So pick the one that feels right and go with it.
Basically that's it.
The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between Sass and SCSS syntax?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

There are three ways to selectively include CSS on a specific page: 1. Inline CSS, suitable for pages that are not frequently accessed or require unique styles; 2. Load external CSS files using JavaScript conditions, suitable for situations where flexibility is required; 3. Containment on the server side, suitable for scenarios using server-side languages. This approach can optimize website performance and maintainability, but requires balance of modularity and performance.

Flexboxisidealforone-dimensionallayouts,whileGridsuitstwo-dimensional,complexlayouts.UseFlexboxforaligningitemsinasingleaxisandGridforprecisecontroloverrowsandcolumnsinintricatedesigns.

The HTML popover attribute transforms elements into top-layer elements that can be opened and closed with a button or JavaScript. Popovers can be dismissed a number of ways, but there is no option to auto-close them. Preethi has a technique you can u

CSS blocks page rendering because browsers view inline and external CSS as key resources by default, especially with imported stylesheets, header large amounts of inline CSS, and unoptimized media query styles. 1. Extract critical CSS and embed it into HTML; 2. Delay loading non-critical CSS through JavaScript; 3. Use media attributes to optimize loading such as print styles; 4. Compress and merge CSS to reduce requests. It is recommended to use tools to extract key CSS, combine rel="preload" asynchronous loading, and use media delayed loading reasonably to avoid excessive splitting and complex script control.

In the following tutorial, I will show you how to create Lottie animations in Figma. We'll use two colorful designs to exmplify how you can animate in Figma, and then I'll show you how to go from Figma to Lottie animations. All you need is a free Fig

We put it to the test and it turns out Sass can replace JavaScript, at least when it comes to low-level logic and puzzle behavior. With nothing but maps, mixins, functions, and a whole lot of math, we managed to bring our Tangram puzzle to life, no J

ThebestapproachforCSSdependsontheproject'sspecificneeds.Forlargerprojects,externalCSSisbetterduetomaintainabilityandreusability;forsmallerprojectsorsingle-pageapplications,internalCSSmightbemoresuitable.It'scrucialtobalanceprojectsize,performanceneed

No,CSSdoesnothavetobeinlowercase.However,usinglowercaseisrecommendedfor:1)Consistencyandreadability,2)Avoidingerrorsinrelatedtechnologies,3)Potentialperformancebenefits,and4)Improvedcollaborationwithinteams.
