There are three major problems with using ID for style design: first, the ID selector is too specific and makes it difficult to overwrite; second, the ID cannot be reused to force code duplication or structural compromise; finally, modern development has better alternatives. The high specificity of ID makes style modification difficult, easily causing redundant code and!important abuse; the limitation of ID uniqueness in HTML hinders style reuse, while class selectors naturally support multi-element reuse; currently available tools such as BEM, CSS-in-JS and Tailwind provide greater flexibility and maintainability. Although IDs are useful in anchor linking or JavaScript positioning, they should be avoided for style design to ensure scalability and consistency of CSS.
Using IDs for styling might seem straightforward at first, but it can lead to some real headaches down the line. The main issue is that IDs are too specific and rigid for most styling needs. While they get the job done in simple cases, they tend to cause more problems than they solve in larger or more complex projects.
ID Selectors Are Overly Specific
One of the biggest downsides of using IDs in CSS is their high specificity. An ID selector like #header
has a much higher priority than classes or element selectors. This means if you try to override styles later—say with a theme or responsive layout—you'll find yourself fighting against your own code.
- You may end up writing even more specific selectors just to make changes.
- It becomes tempting to use
!important
, which leads to messy, hard-to-maintain code.
Instead of relying on IDs, using class-based selectors give you more flexibility and makes your CSS easier to manage.
IDs Can't Be Reused
HTML IDs are meant to be unique per page. That's great for JavaScript hooks or anchor links, but not so great for styling. If you define a style using an ID, you can't apply it to multiple elements without duplicating code or changing your markup.
For example:
- You want two buttons that look the same.
- One uses
#submit-button
, the other needs the same look but isn't a submit button.
Suddenly, you either write duplicate styles or change how you structure your HTML just for styling purposes. Classes avoid this problem entirely by design.
Better Alternatives Exist
In modern web development, we have better tools for organizing styles:
- Classes let you reuse styles freely and combine them in different ways.
- BEM or similar naming methods help keep your class names meaningful without conflicts.
- CSS-in-JS solutions or utility-first frameworks like Tailwind take reusability even further.
IDs still have their place—for things like fragment identifiers or JavaScript targeting—but styling shouldn't be one of them.
Avoiding IDs for styling might feel like a small detail, but it helps keep your CSS scalable, predictable, and easier to work with over time. Not a flashy rule, but a solid one.
The above is the detailed content of Why is it a good practice to avoid using IDs for styling?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

There are three ways to selectively include CSS on a specific page: 1. Inline CSS, suitable for pages that are not frequently accessed or require unique styles; 2. Load external CSS files using JavaScript conditions, suitable for situations where flexibility is required; 3. Containment on the server side, suitable for scenarios using server-side languages. This approach can optimize website performance and maintainability, but requires balance of modularity and performance.

Flexboxisidealforone-dimensionallayouts,whileGridsuitstwo-dimensional,complexlayouts.UseFlexboxforaligningitemsinasingleaxisandGridforprecisecontroloverrowsandcolumnsinintricatedesigns.

The HTML popover attribute transforms elements into top-layer elements that can be opened and closed with a button or JavaScript. Popovers can be dismissed a number of ways, but there is no option to auto-close them. Preethi has a technique you can u

CSS blocks page rendering because browsers view inline and external CSS as key resources by default, especially with imported stylesheets, header large amounts of inline CSS, and unoptimized media query styles. 1. Extract critical CSS and embed it into HTML; 2. Delay loading non-critical CSS through JavaScript; 3. Use media attributes to optimize loading such as print styles; 4. Compress and merge CSS to reduce requests. It is recommended to use tools to extract key CSS, combine rel="preload" asynchronous loading, and use media delayed loading reasonably to avoid excessive splitting and complex script control.

In the following tutorial, I will show you how to create Lottie animations in Figma. We'll use two colorful designs to exmplify how you can animate in Figma, and then I'll show you how to go from Figma to Lottie animations. All you need is a free Fig

We put it to the test and it turns out Sass can replace JavaScript, at least when it comes to low-level logic and puzzle behavior. With nothing but maps, mixins, functions, and a whole lot of math, we managed to bring our Tangram puzzle to life, no J

ThebestapproachforCSSdependsontheproject'sspecificneeds.Forlargerprojects,externalCSSisbetterduetomaintainabilityandreusability;forsmallerprojectsorsingle-pageapplications,internalCSSmightbemoresuitable.It'scrucialtobalanceprojectsize,performanceneed

No,CSSdoesnothavetobeinlowercase.However,usinglowercaseisrecommendedfor:1)Consistencyandreadability,2)Avoidingerrorsinrelatedtechnologies,3)Potentialperformancebenefits,and4)Improvedcollaborationwithinteams.
